相關主題
商品描述
Only someone from the corporate inside could explain how Yahoo!—one of the greatest brands in corporate history—could rise to the greatest height ever seen in American business…and then crash into oblivion.
For anyone paying attention, the beginning of the end for Yahoo! began with decisions made by the first team of executives while the company was on its way up, which set the stage for horrific decisions made by subsequent generations of Yahoo! leadership. Most decisions were either pure incompetence or just lack of vision by CEOs from 2001 to the present.
Twenty-one years after its incorporation and sixteen years after its stock peak, Yahoo sold for 96% less than its value on January 3, 2000, when it had closed at an all-time high of $118.75 per share, resulting in a market capitalization of $120 billion. Wall Street valued Yahoo!, at that time in business less than six years, higher than it did Disney, News Corporation, and Comcast combined. Also on that day, the iPhone was more than seven years away from launch, Google was four years from its IPO, Amazon was hemorrhaging money, and Mark Zuckerberg was still in high school!
At the end of 2016, the top seven businesses on the list of the highest-valued companies in the world by market capitalization include Apple at #1, Alphabet (Google’s Parent Company) at #2, Amazon.com at #5, and Facebook at #7. Those companies combined are valued in excess of $2 trillion more than the price Verizon paid to acquire Yahoo!
Yahoo!’s story is one of missed strategies, failed opportunities, and poor execution. Early decisions to de-emphasize search features, undervalue Google, and overplay Yahoo’s hand in the Facebook negotiations haunted the rest of the company’s existence. In addition, factors outside of Yahoo’s control—most notably how irrational expectations of Wall Street created an environment where short-term decisions were made at the expense of the long-term good.
The story of Yahoo! is a cautionary tale not intended for the faint of heart.
For anyone paying attention, the beginning of the end for Yahoo! began with decisions made by the first team of executives while the company was on its way up, which set the stage for horrific decisions made by subsequent generations of Yahoo! leadership. Most decisions were either pure incompetence or just lack of vision by CEOs from 2001 to the present.
Twenty-one years after its incorporation and sixteen years after its stock peak, Yahoo sold for 96% less than its value on January 3, 2000, when it had closed at an all-time high of $118.75 per share, resulting in a market capitalization of $120 billion. Wall Street valued Yahoo!, at that time in business less than six years, higher than it did Disney, News Corporation, and Comcast combined. Also on that day, the iPhone was more than seven years away from launch, Google was four years from its IPO, Amazon was hemorrhaging money, and Mark Zuckerberg was still in high school!
At the end of 2016, the top seven businesses on the list of the highest-valued companies in the world by market capitalization include Apple at #1, Alphabet (Google’s Parent Company) at #2, Amazon.com at #5, and Facebook at #7. Those companies combined are valued in excess of $2 trillion more than the price Verizon paid to acquire Yahoo!
Yahoo!’s story is one of missed strategies, failed opportunities, and poor execution. Early decisions to de-emphasize search features, undervalue Google, and overplay Yahoo’s hand in the Facebook negotiations haunted the rest of the company’s existence. In addition, factors outside of Yahoo’s control—most notably how irrational expectations of Wall Street created an environment where short-term decisions were made at the expense of the long-term good.
The story of Yahoo! is a cautionary tale not intended for the faint of heart.
商品描述(中文翻譯)
只有來自企業內部的人才能解釋為什麼 Yahoo!——企業歷史上最偉大的品牌之一——能夠達到美國商業史上前所未見的巔峰……然後卻墜入無底深淵。
對於任何關注此事的人來說,Yahoo! 的終結開始於公司上升過程中第一批高管所做的決策,這些決策為後來 Yahoo! 領導層所做的可怕決策奠定了基礎。大多數決策要麼是純粹的無能,要麼是自 2001 年至今的 CEO 缺乏遠見。
在成立 21 年後和股價達到高峰 16 年後,Yahoo! 的售價比 2000 年 1 月 3 日的價值低了 96%,當時其股價收於每股 118.75 美元,市值達到 1200 億美元。當時,華爾街對 Yahoo! 的估值高於迪士尼、新聞集團和康卡斯特 的總和,而那時 Yahoo! 創立不到六年。此外,在那一天,iPhone 距離推出還有七年多,Google 距離 IPO 還有四年,亞馬遜正在虧損,而馬克·祖克伯格還在上高中!
到 2016 年底,根據市值排名的全球最高價值公司名單中,前七名企業包括蘋果公司排名第一,Alphabet(Google 的母公司)排名第二,亞馬遜排名第五,Facebook 排名第七。這些公司的總市值超過了 Verizon 收購 Yahoo! 時支付的價格超過 2 兆美元。
Yahoo! 的故事是一個錯失策略、失敗機會和執行不力的故事。早期決策降低了搜索功能的重要性,低估了 Google,並在 Facebook 談判中過度自信,這些都困擾著公司後來的存在。此外,Yahoo! 無法控制的因素——最顯著的是華爾街不理性的期望創造了一種環境,使得短期決策以長期利益為代價。
Yahoo! 的故事是一個警示故事,並不適合心臟不夠強大的人。