The Birth of Model Theory: Lowenheim's Theorem in the Frame of the Theory of Relatives
暫譯: 模型理論的誕生:洛維希姆定理在親屬理論中的框架
Calixto Badesa
- 出版商: Princeton University
- 出版日期: 2004-01-25
- 售價: $990
- 語言: 英文
- 頁數: 256
- 裝訂: Hardcover
- ISBN: 0691058539
- ISBN-13: 9780691058535
下單後立即進貨 (約5~7天)
相關主題
商品描述
Löwenheim's theorem reflects a critical point in the history of mathematical logic, for it marks the birth of model theory--that is, the part of logic that concerns the relationship between formal theories and their models. However, while the original proofs of other, comparably significant theorems are well understood, this is not the case with Löwenheim's theorem. For example, the very result that scholars attribute to Löwenheim today is not the one that Skolem--a logician raised in the algebraic tradition, like Löwenheim--appears to have attributed to him. In The Birth of Model Theory, Calixto Badesa provides both the first sustained, book-length analysis of Löwenheim's proof and a detailed description of the theoretical framework--and, in particular, of the algebraic tradition--that made the theorem possible.
Badesa's three main conclusions amount to a completely new interpretation of the proof, one that sharply contradicts the core of modern scholarship on the topic. First, Löwenheim did not use an infinitary language to prove his theorem; second, the functional interpretation of Löwenheim's normal form is anachronistic, and inappropriate for reconstructing the proof; and third, Löwenheim did not aim to prove the theorem's weakest version but the stronger version Skolem attributed to him. This book will be of considerable interest to historians of logic, logicians, philosophers of logic, and philosophers of mathematics.
商品描述(中文翻譯)
Löwenheim 定理反映了數學邏輯歷史中的一個關鍵點,因為它標誌著模型理論的誕生——即關於形式理論及其模型之間關係的邏輯部分。然而,儘管其他同樣重要的定理的原始證明已被很好地理解,但 Löwenheim 定理的情況卻並非如此。例如,當今學者所歸因於 Löwenheim 的結果,並不是 Skolem——一位在代數傳統中成長的邏輯學家,與 Löwenheim 相似——似乎所歸因於他的結果。在《模型理論的誕生》中,Calixto Badesa 提供了對 Löwenheim 證明的首次持續、書本長度的分析,以及使該定理成為可能的理論框架的詳細描述,特別是代數傳統。
Badesa 的三個主要結論構成了對該證明的全新解釋,這一解釋與現代學術界對該主題的核心觀點形成了尖銳的對立。首先,Löwenheim 並未使用無窮語言來證明他的定理;其次,Löwenheim 的標準形式的功能解釋是時代錯誤的,並不適合重建該證明;第三,Löwenheim 的目標並不是證明該定理的最弱版本,而是 Skolem 所歸因於他的更強版本。本書將對邏輯史學家、邏輯學家、邏輯哲學家和數學哲學家具有相當大的興趣。