Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case

Hayashi, Nobuo, Lingaas, Carola

  • 出版商: T.M.C. Asser Press
  • 出版日期: 2024-10-06
  • 售價: $7,030
  • 貴賓價: 9.5$6,679
  • 語言: 英文
  • 頁數: 306
  • 裝訂: Quality Paper - also called trade paper
  • ISBN: 9462656134
  • ISBN-13: 9789462656130
  • 無法訂購

相關主題

商品描述

This book marks the 75th anniversary of the 1948 Hostage Case in which a US military tribunal in Nuremberg acquitted General Lothar Rendulic of devastating Northern Norway on account of his honest factual error. The volume critically reappraises the law and facts underlying his trial, the no second-guessing rule in customary international humanitarian law (IHL) that is named after the general himself, and the assessment of modern battlefield decisions.

Using recently discovered documents, this volume casts major doubts on Rendulic's claim that he considered the region's total devastation and the forcible evacuation of all of its inhabitants imperatively demanded by military necessity at the time. This book's analysis of court records reveals how the tribunal failed to examine relevant facts or explain the Rendulic Rule's legal origin. This anthology shows that, despite the Hostage Case's ambiguity and occasional suggestions to thecontrary, objective reasonableness forms part of the reasonable commander test under IHL and the mistake of fact defence under international criminal law (ICL) to which the rule has given rise. This collection also identifies modern warfare's characteristics--human judgment, de-empathetic battlespace, and institutional bias--that may make it problematic to deem some errors both honest and reasonable. The Rendulic Rule embodies an otherwise firmly established admonition against judging contentious battlefield decisions with hindsight. Nevertheless, it was born of a factually ill-suited case and continues to raise significant legal as well as ethical challenges today.

The most comprehensive study of the Rendulic Rule ever to appear in English, this multi-disciplinary anthology will appeal to researchers and practitioners of IHL and ICL, as well as military historians and military ethicists and offers ground-breaking new research.

Nobuo Hayashi is affiliated to the Centre for International and Operational Law at the Swedish Defence University in Stockholm, Sweden.

Carola Lingaas is affiliated to the Faculty of Social Studies at VID Specialized University in Oslo, Norway.

商品描述(中文翻譯)

本書紀念1948年人質案件的75週年,該案件中,美國軍事法庭在紐倫堡宣判洛塔爾·倫杜利奇將軍因其誠實的事實錯誤而無罪,儘管他對北挪威造成了毀滅性的影響。本書對其審判的法律和事實進行了批判性的重新評估,探討了以將軍本人命名的國際人道法(IHL)中的不再質疑原則,以及對現代戰場決策的評估。

利用最近發現的文件,本書對倫杜利奇聲稱他在當時認為該地區的全面毀滅和所有居民的強制撤離是軍事必要的要求提出了重大質疑。本書對法庭記錄的分析揭示了法庭未能檢視相關事實或解釋倫杜利奇原則的法律來源。這本選集顯示,儘管人質案件存在模糊性並偶爾有相反的暗示,客觀合理性仍然是國際人道法下合理指揮官測試的一部分,以及國際刑法(ICL)下的事實錯誤辯護,該原則由此而生。本書還指出了現代戰爭的特徵——人類判斷、缺乏同理心的戰鬥空間和制度性偏見——這些特徵可能使某些錯誤同時被視為誠實和合理變得問題重重。倫杜利奇原則體現了一種堅定的警告,反對以事後眼光評判有爭議的戰場決策。然而,它源於一個事實上不合適的案例,並在今天仍然引發重大的法律和倫理挑戰。

這是有史以來對倫杜利奇原則最全面的英語研究,這本多學科的選集將吸引國際人道法和國際刑法的研究者和實務者,以及軍事歷史學家和軍事倫理學家,並提供開創性的研究成果。

林田信夫(Nobuo Hayashi)隸屬於瑞典斯德哥爾摩瑞典國防大學國際與作戰法中心。

卡羅拉·林加斯(Carola Lingaas)隸屬於挪威奧斯陸VID專業大學社會科學院。

作者簡介

Nobuo Hayashi is affiliated to the Centre for International and Operational Law at the Swedish Defence University in Stockholm, Sweden.


Carola Lingaas is affiliated to the Faculty of Social Studies at VID Specialized University in Oslo, Norway.

作者簡介(中文翻譯)

Nobuo Hayashi 目前隸屬於瑞典斯德哥爾摩的瑞典國防大學國際與運作法中心。

Carola Lingaas 目前隸屬於挪威奧斯陸的 VID 專業大學社會科學院。