Why America Can't Retrench (and How It Might)

Harris, Peter

  • 出版商: Polity
  • 出版日期: 2024-11-13
  • 售價: $1,020
  • 貴賓價: 9.5$969
  • 語言: 英文
  • 頁數: 240
  • 裝訂: Quality Paper - also called trade paper
  • ISBN: 1509562109
  • ISBN-13: 9781509562107
  • 尚未上市,無法訂購

相關主題

商品描述

Even as growing polarization and hyper-partisanship define society and politics at home, American leaders seem to agree on one thing: US military dominance abroad is essential for national security and international stability. This is despite an upswing in popular support for "doing less" overseas.

What explains Washington's blinkered view of its foreign policy options? Why is the pursuit of military primacy so deeply entrenched in America that alternative approaches have become unthinkable?

The answer, argues Peter Harris, can be found at the level of domestic politics. The modern US state was built during World War II and the Cold War to support a globe-spanning and long-term effort to project military power abroad. This domestic order is hardwired to reject foreign policies of restraint or retrenchment. If the United States is ever to assume a more normal world role, it must first undergo a period of domestic reform, renewal, and realignment. This book explains what these domestic changes might look like - and how a grand strategy of restraint can be implemented from the inside out.

商品描述(中文翻譯)

即使在日益加劇的兩極化和超黨派主義定義了國內的社會和政治,美國領導人似乎在一件事上達成共識:美國在海外的軍事主導地位對於國家安全和國際穩定至關重要。儘管對於「在海外做得更少」的民眾支持有所上升。

華盛頓對其外交政策選擇的狹隘觀點是什麼原因?為什麼追求軍事優越性在美國如此根深蒂固,以至於替代的做法變得不可想像?

彼得·哈里斯(Peter Harris)認為,答案可以在國內政治層面找到。現代美國國家是在第二次世界大戰和冷戰期間建立的,旨在支持一項遍及全球且長期的軍事力量投射努力。這種國內秩序被設計為拒絕克制或縮減的外交政策。如果美國要在未來扮演更正常的世界角色,必須首先經歷一段國內改革、更新和重新調整的時期。本書解釋了這些國內變革可能的樣貌,以及如何從內部實施一項克制的宏大戰略。

作者簡介

Peter Harris is Associate Professor of Political Science at Colorado State University, where his teaching and research focus on international security and US foreign policy. He is also a Non-Resident Fellow with Defense Priorities.

作者簡介(中文翻譯)

彼得·哈里斯(Peter Harris)是科羅拉多州立大學的政治學副教授,他的教學和研究專注於國際安全和美國外交政策。他同時也是國防優先事項(Defense Priorities)的非駐留研究員。