相關主題
商品描述
Every day, Internet users interact with technologies designed to undermine their privacy. Social media apps, surveillance technologies, and the Internet of Things are all built in ways that make it hard to guard personal information. And the law says this is okay because it is up to users to protect themselves―even when the odds are deliberately stacked against them.
In Privacy’s Blueprint, Woodrow Hartzog pushes back against this state of affairs, arguing that the law should require software and hardware makers to respect privacy in the design of their products. Current legal doctrine treats technology as though it were value-neutral: only the user decides whether it functions for good or ill. But this is not so. As Hartzog explains, popular digital tools are designed to expose people and manipulate users into disclosing personal information.
Against the often self-serving optimism of Silicon Valley and the inertia of tech evangelism, Hartzog contends that privacy gains will come from better rules for products, not users. The current model of regulating use fosters exploitation. Privacy’s Blueprint aims to correct this by developing the theoretical underpinnings of a new kind of privacy law responsive to the way people actually perceive and use digital technologies. The law can demand encryption. It can prohibit malicious interfaces that deceive users and leave them vulnerable. It can require safeguards against abuses of biometric surveillance. It can, in short, make the technology itself worthy of our trust.
商品描述(中文翻譯)
每一天,網路使用者都在與旨在削弱他們隱私的技術互動。社交媒體應用程式、監控技術以及物聯網的設計方式都使得保護個人資訊變得困難。而法律則認為這是可以的,因為保護自己是使用者的責任——即使這樣的情況明顯對他們不利。
在《隱私的藍圖》中,伍德羅·哈茲戈(Woodrow Hartzog)對這種現狀提出反對,主張法律應該要求軟體和硬體製造商在產品設計中尊重隱私。當前的法律理論將技術視為價值中立:只有使用者決定它是為了好還是壞。但事實並非如此。正如哈茲戈所解釋的,流行的數位工具是設計來暴露人們並操控使用者披露個人資訊的。
面對矽谷常常自利的樂觀主義和科技傳教的惰性,哈茲戈主張,隱私的獲益應來自於對產品而非使用者的更好規範。當前的使用規範模式助長了剝削。《隱私的藍圖》旨在通過發展一種新的隱私法律的理論基礎來糾正這一點,這種法律能夠響應人們實際上如何感知和使用數位技術。法律可以要求加密。它可以禁止欺騙使用者並使其脆弱的惡意介面。它可以要求對生物識別監控濫用的防護措施。簡而言之,它可以使技術本身值得我們信任。