The Importance of Small Decisions
暫譯: 小決策的重要性
O'Brien, Michael J., Bentley, R. Alexander, Brock, William A.
- 出版商: Summit Valley Press
- 出版日期: 2019-03-12
- 售價: $1,250
- 貴賓價: 9.5 折 $1,188
- 語言: 英文
- 頁數: 160
- 裝訂: Hardcover - also called cloth, retail trade, or trade
- ISBN: 0262039745
- ISBN-13: 9780262039741
海外代購書籍(需單獨結帳)
相關主題
商品描述
How people make decisions in an era of too much information and fake news.
Humans originally evolved in a world of few choices. Prehistoric, preindustrial, and predigital eras required fewer decisions than today's all-access, always-on world of too much information. Economists have largely discarded the idea that agents act rationally and the market follows suit. It seems that no matter how small or innocuous a decision might seem, there's almost no way to guess the effect it might have. The authors of The Importance of Small Decisions view decisions and their outcomes from a different perspective: as key elements in the evolution of culture. In this trailblazing book, they examine different kinds of decisions and map the outcomes, both short- and long-term. Drawing on this, they introduce a map of social behavior that captures the essential elements of human decision-making.
The authors look at the New England Patriots' decision in 2000 to draft an underachieving college quarterback named Tom Brady; they consider Warren Buffett's investment strategy; and they chart the "dancing landscape" of a college applicant's decision-making environment. Finally, they show that decisions can be ranked according to transparency of choice and social influence. When fake news seems indistinguishable from real news and when the internet offers a cacophony of voices, they warn, we can't afford to crowdsource our decisions.
商品描述(中文翻譯)
如何在資訊過載和假新聞的時代中做出決策
人類最初是在選擇有限的世界中進化的。史前、前工業和前數位時代所需的決策遠少於今天這個資訊過多、隨時隨地都能接觸的世界。經濟學家們已經在很大程度上拋棄了代理人理性行動的觀念,市場也隨之而變。似乎無論一個決策看起來多麼微小或無害,幾乎無法預測它可能產生的影響。《小決策的重要性》的作者從不同的角度看待決策及其結果:將其視為文化演變的關鍵要素。在這本開創性的書中,他們檢視不同類型的決策並繪製出短期和長期的結果。基於此,他們介紹了一個社會行為的地圖,捕捉人類決策的基本要素。
作者回顧了2000年新英格蘭愛國者隊選擇一位表現不佳的大學四分衛湯姆·布雷迪的決策;他們考慮了沃倫·巴菲特的投資策略;並繪製了大學申請者決策環境的“舞動景觀”。最後,他們展示了決策可以根據選擇的透明度和社會影響進行排名。他們警告說,當假新聞與真新聞難以區分,且互聯網提供了各種聲音的喧囂時,我們無法依賴群眾智慧來做出決策。