Technically Together: Reconstructing Community in a Networked World (MIT Press)
暫譯: 技術共融:在網絡世界中重建社群 (MIT Press)

Taylor Dotson

相關主題

商品描述

If social interaction by social media has become "the modern front porch" (as one sociologist argues), offering richer and more various contexts for community and personal connection, why do we often feel lonelier after checking Facebook? For one thing, as Taylor Dotson writes in Technically Together, "Try getting a Facebook status update to help move a couch or stay for dinner." Dotson argues that the experts who assure us that "networked individualism" will only bring us closer together seem to be urging citizens to adapt their social expectations to the current limits of technology and discouraging them from considering how technologies could be refashioned to enable other ways of relating and belonging.

Dotson characterizes different instantiations of community as "thick" or "thin," depending on the facets and manifestations of togetherness that they encompass. Individuating social networks are a form of community, he explains, but relatively thin in regard to several dimensions of communality.

Dotson points out that current technological practices are not foreordained but supported by policies, economic arrangements, and entrenched patterns of thought. He examines a range of systems, organizations, and infrastructures -- from suburban sprawl and smartphones to energy grids and "cry-it-out" sleep training for infants -- and considers whether they contribute to the atomization of social life or to togetherness and community vibrancy. Dotson argues that technology could support multifaceted communities if citizens stopped accepting the technological status quo and instead demanded more from their ever-present devices.

商品描述(中文翻譯)

如果社交媒體的社交互動已成為「現代的前廊」(正如一位社會學家所主張的),提供更豐富和多樣的社區及個人連結的背景,那麼為什麼我們在查看 Facebook 後常常感到更孤獨呢?首先,正如 Taylor Dotson 在《Technically Together》中所寫的,「試著讓 Facebook 狀態更新來幫助搬沙發或留下來吃晚餐。」Dotson 主張,那些向我們保證「網絡個人主義」只會讓我們更親近的專家,似乎在敦促公民調整他們的社交期望,以適應當前技術的限制,並不鼓勵他們考慮如何重新塑造技術,以促進其他的關係和歸屬感。

Dotson 將社區的不同實例描述為「厚」或「薄」,這取決於它們所包含的共同體的面向和表現。他解釋說,個體化的社交網絡是一種社區形式,但在幾個共同性維度上相對較薄。

Dotson 指出,當前的技術實踐並非注定如此,而是受到政策、經濟安排和根深蒂固的思維模式的支持。他檢視了一系列系統、組織和基礎設施——從郊區擴張和智能手機到能源網絡和嬰兒的「哭泣訓練」——並考慮它們是否促進了社交生活的原子化,或是促進了共同體的活力。Dotson 主張,如果公民停止接受技術的現狀,而是對他們隨時可用的設備提出更多要求,技術可以支持多面向的社區。