Patently Contestable: Electrical Technologies and Inventor Identities on Trial in Britain (Inside Technology)
暫譯: 可專利的爭議:英國電氣技術與發明者身份的審判 (科技內幕)
Stathis Arapostathis, Graeme Gooday
- 出版商: MIT
- 出版日期: 2013-04-12
- 售價: $1,060
- 貴賓價: 9.5 折 $1,007
- 語言: 英文
- 頁數: 310
- 裝訂: Hardcover
- ISBN: 0262019035
- ISBN-13: 9780262019033
海外代購書籍(需單獨結帳)
相關主題
商品描述
Late nineteenth-century Britain saw an extraordinary surge in patent disputes over the new technologies of electrical power, lighting, telephony, and radio. These battles played out in the twin tribunals of the courtroom and the press. In Patently Contestable, Stathis Arapostathis and Graeme Gooday examine how Britain's patent laws and associated cultures changed from the 1870s to the 1920s. They consider how patent rights came to be so widely disputed and how the identification of apparently solo heroic inventors was the contingent outcome of patent litigation. Furthermore, they point out potential parallels between the British experience of allegedly patentee-friendly legislation introduced in 1883 and a similar potentially empowering shift in American patent policy in 2011. After explaining the trajectory of an invention from laboratory to Patent Office to the court and the key role of patent agents, Arapostathis and Gooday offer four case studies of patent-centered disputes in Britain. These include the mostly unsuccessful claims against the UK alliance of Alexander Graham Bell and Thomas Edison in telephony; publicly disputed patents for technologies for the generation and distribution of electric power; challenges to Marconi's patenting of wireless telegraphy as an appropriation of public knowledge; and the emergence of patent pools to control the market in incandescent light bulbs.
商品描述(中文翻譯)
十九世紀末的英國見證了對於電力、照明、電話和無線電等新技術的專利爭議的驚人激增。這些爭鬥在法庭和媒體這兩個舞台上展開。在《專利的爭議性》中,Stathis Arapostathis 和 Graeme Gooday 研究了英國的專利法及其相關文化如何在1870年代到1920年代之間發生變化。他們考慮了為何專利權會如此廣泛地受到爭議,以及看似獨立的英雄發明者的識別是專利訴訟的偶然結果。此外,他們指出1883年引入的被指控為有利於專利權人的立法與2011年美國專利政策中類似的潛在賦權轉變之間的潛在平行關係。在解釋了從實驗室到專利局再到法庭的發明過程及專利代理人的關鍵角色後,Arapostathis 和 Gooday 提供了四個以專利為中心的爭議案例研究,這些案例包括對亞歷山大·格雷厄姆·貝爾和托馬斯·愛迪生在電話領域的英國聯盟的主要不成功的索賠;對於電力生成和分配技術的公開爭議專利;對馬可尼無線電報專利的挑戰,認為其是對公共知識的侵佔;以及專利池的出現以控制白熾燈泡市場。