Regulating Code: Good Governance and Better Regulation in the Information Age (Hardcover)
暫譯: 規範程式碼:資訊時代的良好治理與更佳規範 (精裝版)

Ian Brown, Christopher T. Marsden

  • 出版商: MIT
  • 出版日期: 2013-03-01
  • 售價: $1,750
  • 貴賓價: 9.8$1,715
  • 語言: 英文
  • 頁數: 288
  • 裝訂: Hardcover
  • ISBN: 0262018829
  • ISBN-13: 9780262018821
  • 立即出貨 (庫存=1)

買這商品的人也買了...

商品描述

Internet use has become ubiquitous in the past two decades, but governments, legislators, and their regulatory agencies have struggled to keep up with the rapidly changing Internet technologies and uses. In this groundbreaking collaboration, regulatory lawyer Christopher Marsden and computer scientist Ian Brown analyze the regulatory shaping of "code" -- the technological environment of the Internet -- to achieve more economically efficient and socially just regulation. They examine five "hard cases" that illustrate the regulatory crisis: privacy and data protection; copyright and creativity incentives; censorship; social networks and user-generated content; and net neutrality.

The authors describe the increasing "multistakeholderization" of Internet governance, in which user groups argue for representation in the closed business-government dialogue, seeking to bring in both rights-based and technologically expert perspectives. Brown and Marsden draw out lessons for better future regulation from the regulatory and interoperability failures illustrated by the five cases. They conclude that governments, users, and better functioning markets need a smarter "prosumer law" approach. Prosumer law would be designed to enhance the competitive production of public goods, including innovation, public safety, and fundamental democratic rights.

商品描述(中文翻譯)

在過去的二十年中,網際網路的使用已變得無處不在,但政府、立法者及其監管機構卻難以跟上快速變化的網際網路技術和用途。在這項開創性的合作中,監管律師克里斯多福·馬斯登(Christopher Marsden)和計算機科學家伊恩·布朗(Ian Brown)分析了「代碼」(code)——網際網路的技術環境的監管塑造,以實現更具經濟效率和社會公正的監管。他們檢視了五個「困難案例」,這些案例說明了監管危機:隱私和數據保護;版權和創意激勵;審查制度;社交網絡和用戶生成內容;以及網路中立性。

作者描述了網際網路治理中日益增加的「多方利益相關者化」,在這種情況下,用戶群體主張在封閉的商業-政府對話中獲得代表權,試圖引入基於權利和技術專家的觀點。布朗和馬斯登從這五個案例所示的監管和互操作性失敗中提取出未來更好監管的教訓。他們得出結論,政府、用戶和更有效的市場需要一種更智能的「生產者消費者法」(prosumer law)方法。生產者消費者法旨在增強公共產品的競爭性生產,包括創新、公共安全和基本民主權利。